Re: [DECK] Heavy Tonnage

"salem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:01:20 -0500, "Colin Riggs"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scrawled:
>
>
> >master. I would take out Humanitas (thats what Disarm is for) and add 2
>
> now, disarming them and having them still have blood so they can pay
> for rescue is good. however, i think the important thing about
> Humanitas/Catacombs is the _stealth_ it adds to Fame rescues. throwing
> in a chump blocker then becomes a tad more arduous, and if they do,
> you slave over to Ublo and tear them a new plug hole for their
> colostomy bag. and then you rescue the fame guy anyway with your
> cat/humanitas guy because it's not prohibited by NRA and you untapped
> after Ublo slaved in. :)

Sure, the effect is reasonably good, but worth an action/master and 2 card
slots? Maybe you can make an argument for Humanitas, but I'd rather make the
deck better at beating people up, than better than rescuing people from
torpor at 1 stealth. 1 stealth doesn't tend to get much done around here.
:).


> >All in all, it seems relatively solid. You will just have to hope that
the
> >dominate makes up for the loss in weenieness. You have a definite
advantage
> >in combat heavy environs with the fortitude, just not sure how you would
> >compare to weenie rush in the tournament scene.
>
> well, it's unlikely anyone's going to panic after he brings up his
> first gargoyle. unlike, say, if your first influence phase is paul
> dicarlo and Koko. and your 2nd influence is Agatha...

And I suppose he is less vulnerable to Anarchist uprising. I don't think
being underestimated really makes a difference in effectiveness. Fear has
its upsides and downsides.

Colin Riggs
living in...?