
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
sqweek writes: > Josh Singh wrote: >> sqweek writes: >>> Josh Singh wrote: >>>> I'm not a misogynist. >>> >>>> However, somewhere along >>>> the line, it seems as though "equal rights" was twisted to mean >>>> something along the lines of "*more* 'equal' rights for the >>>> ----weaker---- sex", >>> >>> (----emphasis---- mine) >>> Some curious diction from a self-professed non-sexist? >> >> You think I really believe women are the "weaker" sex? > > Yes, it appeared that way to me. Acknowledged. I'll try a clearer wording next time. >> Besides, what's the crime in being a "self-professed" non-sexist? > > Absolutely nothing. But reading it as I did, I saw you claim to be > non- sexist and then say women are the weaker sex in practically the > same sentence. ;) > In the face of this apparent inconsistency, I posted the question to > provoke elaboration. Understood. Very sharp of you. <adds sqweek to personal hit list (after the cast of Friends)> > sqweek, enjoying exercising his vocabulary, yearning for a better word > than 'non-sexist' Lad-/Lady-liker? I'm sure someone on TV will come up with a politically correct way to say it within a few years. -- The Insolent Human Toxin, Curry Bucket DeadHeads' Delight 0.5.0, the parody of Drug Wars Free d/l at www.geocities.com/currybucket
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |