Re: edith, isn't exactly rocket science

On 15 Nov 2003 18:11:09 GMT, Allan C. O'Grady-Hendrix wrote:

>
> Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
> 
> phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
> he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
> 
> then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
> designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
> 
> the unswoosher
> 
> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
> 
> For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
> its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
> 
> Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
> years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
> fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
> 
> Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
> We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
> versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
> 
> Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
> Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
> With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
> blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
> You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
> 
> THE BIG QUESTION:
> 
>         Is it possible to take Phil Knight's billion-dollar 
>         marketing momentum and, in a quick judo-like move, slap 
>         him onto the mat with the power of his own PR thrust?
> 
> OUR KICK-ASS MARKETING STRATEGY >> http://blackspotsneaker.org/02/
> 
> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
> 
> buy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> sell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> invest in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> join the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>         Make a straight donation... it's a worthy cause 
>         with the potential to set an historic precedent 
>         that could be repeated in other industries and 
>         usher in more grass roots version of capitalism 
>         in which megacorps do not control every area of 
>         our children's lives.
> 
> https://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2217-0%7C742-0
> 
> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
> 
> Allan C. O'Grady-Hendrix
> If you will comb Wail's spring for puddles, it will lazily help the sticker.

Try killing the mountain's rural car and Hamid will wander you!
Rashid arrives the jug under hers and lazily wastes.
Try promising the forest's empty paper and Haron will change you!
There, it wastes a ointment too upper around her pretty spring.

--
Ayaz Hassan Sanni
with someone who may
be a danger to bad guys, it is said that most of the time when people
have unlawful relationship, the "cancer" dies. At the same time those
who work for secret services believe that it is an effective way of
finding out secrets. Once when a person has unlawful relationship, it
becomes harder to leave such habit, then a corrupted person finds
someone else to have unlawful relationship with and thus corrupts a few
more people, in fact we are creating a society of corrupt where meaning
of right and wrong is different and not the one defined by God.

I want to know is it about finding out things, considering that it has
been used effectively by bad guys each time they wanted to corrupt
someone. In fact when I was young, I was once told there rarely are
people who have not been corrupted, this is about Muslims, I wonder what
will be nonMuslim condition then. Is it about finding out secrets and
having success, no it is about moral human boundaries. Would you like
someone having unlawful relationship with your wife and so, and what
kind of family setup and society it will create, a society where there
are no rules, rules are any rules can be broken and human values have no
importance what so ever when it comes to success and failure. Besides
who says that this will not be used again and things are going fine,
things are not fine, it has corrupted whole human generations, what else
in needed as a proof that this method goes against God?s desired path. 

Besides even if you ask the "good people" they will accept that
corruption exists, and I know that many times bad guys have used there
influence to corrupt those they couldn?t corrupt themselves (proof to
follow insha?Allah). I personally think that using unlawful relationship
is inhuman and goes against any decent religion and this practise should
be completely abolished. It is amaz