Re: D20 Featless?

Neale Davidson wrote:
>> That was sort of what I had in mind. For more experienced players
>> feats is the only way to go though!
>
> He's being a smartass, he's nearly completely described the 'old
> school' Basic Dungeons and Dragons set. The only real difference
> remaining is
> the different level/experience point rates.

I wasn't actually trying to be a smartass, but, yes, that's precisely what I
was describing.

Note that this actually would be more like a D20/BD&D hybrid, because you
would eliminate the THAC0 aspect of BD&D and add a simplified skills system.

Again, I wouldn't play it, but it would be useful for introducing someone to
the system without overloading them with "useless" information.

-- 
Reginald Blue
"I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my
telephone.  My wish has come true.  I no longer know how to use my
telephone."
 - Bjarne Stroustrup (originator of C++) [quoted at the 2003
International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces]