
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 11:39:06 -0500, Rob Kelk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> carved upon a tablet of ether: > Because those group names are useless as descriptions. What is an > "Expert" expert at, and how is that different from being "Adept" at > something? (In various point-based systems, both terms are used to > indicate high skill levels.) What does every "Commoner" have in common? Interesting. Because a system uses a word as a Term of Art, a different system can't use it to mean something else. When discussin things in a D&D environment, who the heck cares what GURPS or Hero use the terms for? > Does a "Warrior" fight from > horseback with a lance, or on foot with a bow, or from the back lines > with a missile weapon? (These are all very different skills, which > don't offer very much crossover between each other in the real world.) Why does warrior have to be such a tight term? It's not in real life. -- Rupert Boleyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Just because the truth will set you free doesn't mean the truth itself should be free."
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |