
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Michael Scott Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > "Brandon Cope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Malachias Invictus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > "Wolfie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Mr. Brandon mentioned the 1e DMG so I thought I would get mine out and > read > > > > their description of HP in the D&D inflationary HP system. > > > > > > > > The Following are various quotes from D&D DMG 1e page 82: > > > > > > Utterly irrelevant. We are not talking about 1E here. > > > > Despite it having the best explaination of what inflationary HPs are? > > Get this through your fucking head - 1st edition's rationalizations were > utterly absurd when subjected to scrutiny, and did not describe a believable > set of assumptions. The description of inflationary HPs in 1/e is the *only one* that makes any sense in any version of AD&D (including 3.x). > > Hps in 1979 under AD&D 1/e are not fundamentally different from D&D > > HPs in 2003. > > Mechanically, they *operate* the same (damage is subtracted from hit > points) - but the system behind the mechanics has been upgraded and made > more coherent No, they have been simplified and made less coherent. > (a) claim that you don't need to read 3E because it uses the same system > as 1E and therefore has the same "obsolete" mechanics and is therefore > worthy of mockery > (b) simultaneously claim that 1E had the "best" explanation of hit > points. There is not a contradiction between these two things, assuming you add "... in the AD&D line." to (b). > What *I* see is that 1E is the ONLY VERSION YOU HAVE READ I have read the 2/e PHB and DMG and used large parts of them in play. I have read through selected parts of 3.x, primarily by way of the SRD. > and therefore > it is the "best" version for *you* because you can't understand a system any > more sophisticated So GURPS is less sophisticated than D&D 3.x? That's the stupidest thing you've implied in quite some time. Brandon
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |