
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Wayne Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 04:27:03 GMT, James Quick
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >The last time I played Hero, we used an averaging d6 (2,2,3,3,4,4) as
> >the STUNx die, and I was much happier with the results.
>
> That works too, though it still means you have a lot of varience
> compared to Normal attacks.
Yes, but that variance is reduced from the normal KA's
> Killing attacks intrinsically are more
> varied already because of the small number of dice per damage class,
> and I really don't see it as particularly desireable in a SHRPG to
> make them moreso.
>
> >I have considered using the d6 from Formula De (2,3,3,4,4,4) as well.
>
> Though that does balance the stun rather high if you look;
> classically, it should likely run the other direction given the way
> the stanard methods average (2.6 stun per killing body).
It would be nice to find a 2,2,2,3,3,4 die just for STUNx (I'd even
settle for a 2,2,3,3,3,4 die)
> The problem with AVLDs is they cost more than an Ego Attack.
Yep. Expensive, but very nasty at times.
--
James Quick [][][] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Profanity is the first resort of the inarticulate motherfucker.
-- Elizabeth D. Brooks, among others.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |