Re: Diplomacy clumps

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Akorps666 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>you CONCEDED DEFEAT *BEFORE* that false update hit. 
>
>No, I sat down at the terminal to start my attack, then I noticed
>the false update had hit, then I conceded.

According to multiple sources, you posted a concede announcement
before the false update hit. 


>You just have your facts wrong Mith, but you have so many of
>them wrong that your technique of "argumentation by exhaustion"
>(throwing out so many false statements that refuting them all
>is an intractable problem) is more than I can deal with.

Ah right. So, I ask you to provide evidence of your incorrect
position, and you then turn the whole thing around and try to
blame me for being wrong?

How about some evidence first of your 'clumps' Mr. Tedrick, eh?

Argument by exhaustion? Fine. Ignore everything else. Provide
evidence of your 'clumps'. Just one little topic. I'm sure you
can handle that, can't you?

If you can't, you owe this community a retraction and apology.

-Geoff