
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Christopher Dearlove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard > Hutnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >>I know that games have been knocked as inferior that eliminate players >>from the game. I guess the feeling is that it means that people have >>nothing to do. Well, in some cases, it is beneficial to eliminate >>players. If a player has NO chance of winning, the best thing to do >>is to eliminate them. > > Apart from the "nothing else to do", which depends a lot on your social > setting, True. At our game club, being eliminated from a game is no problem - there will be another game starting soon. IMO one of the weaknesses of Risk 2210 is the fact that there is usually NO incentive to eliminate players. So a powerless player will just sit there, powerless, waiting for the game to end.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |