
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
stop trolling. most of those 10 million people were probably incarcerated for a reason. Perhaps you should recruit them, and not us law abiding citizens. SuperXdude http://www.doubleedge.net/ - For a friend "Bruce Reilly (a.k.a Bruha)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dear Judges, Lawyers, Policemen, Guards, Counselors, Taxpayers, et. al., > > We are here. Like it or not, for good or bad, we are here. Who are we? We are the > downtrodden and dispossesed, the self-torturing, the disenfranchised convicts, > drug and alcohol addicts, the unemployed and unemployable. We are the children of > poverty, financial and spiritual. We have and will have children of our own, > grandchildren too. We are ex-cons, uninsured, homeless, of many colors and speaking > many tongues. We are the enemy in what has become a domestic war against ourselves. > > And who are you? You who like the tough talk of Tough on Crime? You who watch as > budgets are cut in education and health care while you militarize a police force? > Bullet-proof vests, automatic weapons, helicopters, tanks, robots ... the > testosterone is oozing through the streets, more prisons, longer sentences, tighten > the belt, spartan conditions, task forces, gang units, gun courts. And what is there > to show for it? Unemployent stays low because half the population oversees those > "out of the workforce", the dregs, the rabble, the enemy? Please tell me there is a > deeper reason. Do you feel safer? More humane? More like a cohesive society with a > shared sense of purpose, who can identify Us and Them? Do you live in a gated > community or gentrified neighborhood? By the way, have you read the Declaration of > Independence and US Constitution - or do you only know the first phrases? > > It's about time we got together. Please know that I have yet to meet a convict who > wants their child to be a thief, an addict, a dealer, a prostitute, or a violent > individual. Most of us still have hope for ourselves even when stuck in the darkest > dilemmas, ruts and catch-22s. Most of us believe in crafting laws and instilling > order. Many of us have burrowed beneath the surface to find a spiritual sense of > being, an understanding force at least as powerful as those we succumbed to, and many > of use wouldn't escape if you opened the front door. Did you know that approximately > 10 million Americans are either incarcerated, on probation, on parole or once were in > those categories? Each of those 10 million have families, friends, neighbors ... and > so closer and closer does the We interface with the You. Don't you think it's time we > talked? > > Are you ready? Can you accept that the road we are travelling points toward a grim > and painful future? Do you have the heart to face monumental failures while bravely > struggling beyond where we are now? I know that some of you are, and that some of us > are, and this is what gives me hope. You need our insights just as we need your > structure. It is never over, especially when a real solution, a real treatment for > our sickness, is yet to begin. > > In Solidarity, > > Bruce Reilly (a.k.a Bruha) > P.O.Box 8274 > Cranston, RI 02920 USA > > P.S. - I am trying to conceptualize an effective guerilla media campaign to promote > this cause. Ideas are welcome. Collaboration is prayed. > > > > > > > > > > 4) The newgroup message will be sent by the news.announce.newgroups > moderator at the end of the waiting period of a successful vote. > > 5) A proposal which has failed under point (3) above should not again > be brought up for discussion until at least six months have passed > from the close of the vote. This limitation does not apply to > proposals which never went to vote or polls that were cancelled or > invalidated. > > ADDITIONAL REFERENCES: > > If you want to create a new group, the following additional documents > should be read before you begin the process. > > Subject: How to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal > Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups, news.groups > > Subject: How to Write a Good Newsgroup Proposal > Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups, news.groups > > Subject: Usenet Newsgroup Creation Companion > Newsgroups: news.groups, news.announce.newusers, news.answers > > Subject: What is Usenet? > Newsgroups: news.announce.newusers, news.admin.misc, news.answers > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David C Lawrence) > Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups, news.groups, news.announce.newusers, > news.admin.misc > Subject: How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 16:25:28 GMT > > Archive-name: usenet/creating-newsgroups/part1 > Original-author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Woods) > Comment: enhanced & edited until 5/93 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gene Spafford) > Last-change: 31 Jan 1997 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David C Lawrence) > > GUIDELINES FOR USENET GROUP CREATION > > REQUIREME > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |