
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zeke) wrote:
> If Sam is kill-filed, that doesn't mean all of our replies are.
However, in this case, there has not been a single posting to
this thread that does not somewhere offer the phrase "Sam Sloan".
> Unfortunately "Google" does not have a killfile ability, but
> hopefully most people have already killfiled this thread.
Aside from whether "hopefully" is an agreeable term, the fact
here concerns people with killfile talk who do not walk the walk.
> In any case, "Reckless Crossposter" could be a phrase employed
> by Michael when really Spam Sloan is only known by a similar title.
> Personally, I didn't previously know Spam Sloan as a "Reckless
> Crossposter," but due to the irrelevance of his post to many of the
> newsgroups posted to I believe the title fits.
Most anything could be true, especially for quantum mechanics.
My issue (introduced here) did not concern whether "Sam Sloan"
is going to be established as a "Reckless Crossposter." The issue
concerned Michael's usage of the little-known term "known" when
trying to speak about "Reckless Crossposter" for the context where
this phrase had never seen a prior appearance on the USENET,
other than a single invocation for an -unrelated- case in 1992.
- regards
- jb
-------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Larry W. (Wayno) Phillips wrote:
>>>>> He's organizing this World Championship of Chinese Poker,
>>>>> therefore any chess related issues he has should go into a poker
>>>>> newsgroup? I don't follow the logic. I'm not saying it's wrong-- I
>>>>> just don't get the connection.
>> Michael Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Sam Sloan is a known Reckless Crossposter.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (-) wrote:
>> I just did a "google" search on "Reckless Crossposter" for -all- of
>> the newsgroups, but you are the -first- and -only- one to deploy that
>> phrase. Therefore your assertion, concerning what is "known" about
>> Sam Sloan, was false. It has never been a label applied to anybody.
>> Except, of course, the phrase "Reckless Cross Poster" (three words)
>> got invoked on Jan 23, 1992 by "Paula Burch" yet only indirectly with
>> reference to a "Clayton Cramer" whom you have not established as
>> being even distantly related to Sam Sloan, much less a co-conspirator.
>> Sam Sloan is more interesting in his variegations than are you in your
>> obsessively monomaniacal and monosyllabic "Go" preoccupations.
>>>> ... You'll note he posted to rec.games.go as well even though this
>>>> has even less to do with go...
>> What qualifies you to -determine- what is related to Go, or not?
>>>> the difference is, over here in rec.games.go, we have been hit by Mr. Sloan
>>>> often before and have all duly killfiled him. I recommend you do the same.
>> If you had Mr.Sloan killfilled already, then why were you replying to
>> this thread? Obviously, you are not even following your own advice.
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam Sloan) wrote:
>>> Aha. But you have failed to notice that Grandmaster Keene also says
>>> that he will organize World Championship events for the game of Go.
>>>
>>> Take a look at the links at the bottom of
>>> http://www.samsloan.com/rtg-resp.htm
>> Which thereby brings back on-topic Keene's other non-Go activities?
>>
>> - regards
>> - jb
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> U.N. appoints HIV-positive puppet as "champion for children"
>> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=553&ncid=751&e=9&u=/ap/20031124/ap_wo_en_he/un_gen_un_aids_puppet
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |