Proofreading (was Re: Basic Chess Endings revised by Benko)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gaillard) wrote:

> Basic Chess Endings was the book I learned by endgames from, many
> years ago, and while I own and like the new _Fundamental Chess
> Endings_, I still use the old BCE quite a lot; I think it has some
> advantages as a reference work.  So, is the proofreading of the
> conversion to algebraic good?  I assume Benko's revisions are fine--I
> can't imagine he'd do a bad job.

I'm curious: has proofreading gotten better with the advent of really 
good chess computers? I'd think there'd be a way to run the moves 
through a good program to find out if there are errors.

--Harold Buck


"I used to rock and roll all night,
 and party every day.
 Then it was every other day. . . ."
      -Homer J. Simpson