Re: A Crime by a Board of Old Imposters

Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>  Sidney Cadot [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

> Sid,
> good to know that your name is Sidney and not Jaap, otherwise people would
> attend a good demonstrations of the lack of flexibility of Jaap vd Herik.
> Smartness often makes circles and this is such a circle here. You simply don't
> or won't get it what Bob hyatt is telling you. Reason? Because you have the
> prejudice that you want to prove that jaa, the TD, has done a good job.

Nonsense. I suggest you practice your reading skills.

> Idon't know why but I have a suspicion. For reasons I will keep secret, because
> I can't reveil the technology, I think that you are Jaap. I can't help it.

Could it be that this "technology" involves wrapping a sheet of tin foil 
in a conic shape around your hat?

> Let me tell you that your position, based on the split between engine and GUI
> is completely nonsense. I know that many make the same mistake.

Ok, so now the arguments come, I presume...?

> But do also
> note what Amir has written. You made a decision and then you heard what the
> Jonny author said in Graz. Suddenly you knew that you had made a stupid
> decision. But - you had declared that the decion "would be a final one"! So by
> definition you saw no way out other than leaving the decision untouched.
> You see? Your fault is not one out of smartness, lack of smartness.
> It's something else. That is psychologically and interesting problem. 
> You were unable to simply say this:
> "Folks, under these aspects now our former decision _of course_ can't
> be held up. We must make a new decision. I admit that my fault was,
> not to talk to Johannes Zwanzger. Next year I will engage Rolf as my
> personal psychologist and consultant."

Ah no, more "I am Jaap v.d. Herik". Please excuse my lack of response to 
this.

You really should get out more. There's more to life than sneeking 
behind your Dad's computer and being a twit on Usenet, you know.

Regards,

  Sidney