
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Ted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Danny Hardesty wrote: > > "raylopez99" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> I like to play the advance variation of the French defense (C02) when > >> blitzin on the internet. > >> > >> A interesting opening (a new book 'Advance and Other Anti-French > >> Variations > >> by Lev Psakhis (Paperback - February 2004)' is coming out and Tony > >> Kosten has a good book on it). > >> > >> Very tactical, black usually does not get a good chance to castle, > >> and, as in all French variations, Black has to fight off a furious > >> attack by White before it can counterattack. > >> > >> Anybody play this successfully as Black? Seems like it's like the > >> King's Gambit with White, probably flawed, but fun to play. > >> > >> RL > > > > I did a quick run through my Chessbase98 database (admittedly not up > > to date) and it had Korchnoi and Uhlmann both scoring more wins with > > black than losses in the Advance French. Overall, regardless of > > player, CO2 had black scoring 49% and white 51%. The statistics on > > the icc were interesting too. A "search eco=C02" revealed a higher > > percentage of white wins (53%) compared to black wins (46%). > > > > Danny Hardesty > > > Leaving only 1% for draws? Methinks you're pulling our legs. > > Ted No Ted, not pulling your leg. The statistics I "pulled" were from the pool of wins, not the total pool of games played, so draws were excluded as I was interested only in the games with decisive results. Danny Hardesty
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |