
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
I'm spending much more time on BBO these days than I am on OKB. I find myself going back to OKB occasionally and getting irritated that I actually have to ask a person what their bid means rather than just clicking on the bid. Ok..ok..so there are things about both programs that irritate me but the thing is that I have confidence that the BBO bugs will be worked out whereas OKB hasn't changed in years. There is a new version of BBO every month or so it seems. When was OKB4.10 produced? 4 years ago? OKB could allow users to run their own tournaments but that would decrease those who'd pay extra for a tournament membership. I've made numerous suggestions to OKB and I don't think I've ever even gotten a response let alone actually see them do something. Thanks again Fred... Todd "Fred Gitelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Barry Margolin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I also don't care much for the BBO GUI. The player display in the lobby > > is really painful to scroll through. In general, the OKB display seems > > more clean and stylish to me, analogous to the difference between > > Macintosh and Windows GUIs. > > We certainly have to rewrite this aspect of the software. > It worked fine when (not so long ago) we rarely had more > than 100 players online at one time. It does not work so > well when there are 1600+ people online (as there have > been for several hours during the past few days). > > One difficult issue is that I strongly believe it is a good > thing to have is a "dynamic lobby" (like we do) as opposed > to the user having to click a "refresh" button (as was necessary > in the last version of OKB I saw - maybe a year ago). Not > exactly sure how to make this workable when there are so > many people online. Working on it.... > > Someone else was wondering about using GIB in some > parts of BBO. Likely this will be possible in the not too > distant future. > > Hard to predict when you will see a release that will > include these (and other) features. All I can promise is > that we are committed to making BBO as good we can. > We have 2 (strong but unpaid ) programmers working > pretty much full time on the BBO project. The software > has been improving at a rapid pace for the past 2 years > and I have every reason to believe this will continue. > > Appreciate all of the suggestions that have appeared > in rgb (and those that I receive every day by e-mail). > It is much easier for us to make design decisions that > people will like when we receive feedback from them! > > Fred Gitelman > Bridge Bsae Inc. > www.bridgebase.com > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |