
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
I am against any state or federal smoking ban (I think it should be up to the casino to decide), but I do have to say it has HELPED my game. Now, instead of going on tilt, I get up, leave table, have smoke. When I come back, tilt go bye-bye. In the past, I stayed, had cig, pissed away money playing like shit. So, a smoking ban can be very good for the smokers, and very bad for those who don't. "John W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > There is a growing debate regarding smoking in gaming establishments. There > is merit to both sides of the argument. In the long run, will the clean > air attract more non-smokers who currently eschew casinos because of the > smoke infestation? Will this amount be enough to offset the smokers who > will not return? Are non-smokers more conservative(in general) in gambling. > Do smokers have a higher propensity for gambling and alcohol addiction? > With all things being equal, based on demographic information, is the > expected profit per smoker higher than the non-smoker? I'm not interested > in discussion on why smoking should or should not be allowed, but more to > the financial impact to the industry if it is banned vs maintaining the > status quo. > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |