Re: For those of you with selective memories ...

(.)(.) wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 02:10:18 GMT, Johnny99 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> > Warning was issued here ..
> >
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/xfxh
> >
> >
> > and then ignored here ..
> >
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/xfyp
>
>
> <snip>
>
> It's always someone else's fault, huh ?
>
> It must be *someones* fault that you have no friends, huh ?
>
> Look in the mirror Johnny, it's his fault.
>
> Not ours.


I dunno...
Looking at this OBJECTIVELY, I have to say that while I was
mocked/ridiculed  **BY JOE**  because I included rules in the
FOOTBALL CHALLENGE which allow for the removal of a participant
for "unsportsmanlike conduct" (particularly toward the monitor),
at least those who'd likely act that way (JMitaly, collard, SoS
beetMORON, maggot, etc) *were* made EXPLICITLY aware of that rule
beforehand...no surprises...all upfront, honorably...
   Joe, the one who mocked my procedures, declared no such rules
for his contest...In fact, if anything, Joe tried to make himself
appear as if he was on some alleged higher moral ground
by proposing virtually the opposite:

    "Anyone who wants to have a little fun with this NFL Contest
     is more than welcome to give it a shot. Nobody gets kicked
     out for dissin the monitor ... and I don't give a shit about
     "official anything."
                                       -Joe Mitaly  8-21-03

So, truthfully, Johnny99 could be said to have entered, *IN PART*
under the auspices that JOE was NOT going to administer *THAT*
contest - in regard to "unsportsmanlike conduct" - in the same way
which Brian or HC do, something JOE had previously mocked.

Creating an environment to entice folks to enter under a
certain set of assumptions (where no written rules are present)
then, in effect, reneging on those assumptions, even if he
might feel there may be warrant, well, aside from seeming
dishonorable, it's funny how things come full circle on
those who mock/ridicule others...