
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 01 Dec 2003 23:47:38 GMT, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Once again Pokerstars PROVING they have the absolute best customer service. They researched the situation, and got back to you with examples ---- See what Party will do for you.. >> In reviewing such things, the first thing we look for is a possible >> relationship between the two players. In this case, it appears clear that >> the two players do know each other. They are from the same location, and >> have shared a computer in the past. They have also played together quite >> frequently (although 'ovialli' is a very new player, so does not have many >> hands overeall). >> >> That said, there is no rule against playing with friends as long as you >> play them hard and fair just like you would against any other player. I >> have reviewed every hand where they sat at the same table and found no >> indication of them doing anything unethical. They often played hands where >> one held cards the other needed, or hands where they held duplicated cards >> (I saw one hand where they both saw the flop with QTo). They also do not >> appear to try and squeeze other players out, nor do they make pot building >> raises for one another. I saw several occasions where one bluffed the other >> one out. Overall, their play appears essentially spotless for all the >> standard forms of collusion. >> >> I have also reviewed the chat on the hand in question and it is >> inappropriate, you are correct. I also see that 'babajoon' immediately >> agreed that it was inappropriate and apologized: >> >> babajoon call 9 11/27/2003 11:22:30 PM >> babajoon bluffing 9 11/27/2003 11:22:44 PM >> Big Orange one player to a hand 1 11/27/2003 11:22:59 PM >> babajoon sorry 9 11/27/2003 11:23:08 PM >> >> Overall, there appears to be no evidence that these players are working >> together in any way. I will however place notes in both of their accounts >> to indicate their relationship so that if future odd play is noted, there >> will be a record of your email and this investigation for reference. > >_________________________________________________________________ >Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |