
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "mmcd0100" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >... I still feel that they try to tilt the >playing field to some degree to favor the bad players, not so they win >necessarily, but just so over time, they lose less and slower. Any one >have thoughts on this? I think that may be one very good explanation for why bets are capped even when heads up. Another reason it's probably done (which holds true for a few B&M rooms, too) is that the rake is usually already capped and the room wants the next hand dealt (and rake taken). More hands, more rake. Peg
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |