
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Lou Krieger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > >> "Alan Shank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > There's that idea again! This is a gross misunderstanding of probability. In > a negative-expectation game, the house will come out ahead, long term; the > players, taken as an aggregate, will lose. This DOES NOT mean that ALL the > players will lose. Some will win, even long term. This is due to variance, > our friend. << > > You're right, of course, Alan in your assertion that some players will be > long term winners. So will those few lottery players who hit the Power Ball > mega jackpot and walk away with $50 million or so. But that's sort of > beside the point. I don't think it's "beside the point," at all. I was responded to this sentence: "it's a game of negitive expectation, thus one can never win long-term." so my response was exactly to the point. (He can't even spell "negative.") > In Baccarat, or any other casino table game in which the > odds are immutable and favor the house, one can neither identify nor predict > which players will be fortunate enough to be long term winners. Moreover, > decisions one makes at the table are completely irrelevant in terms of > influencing the results achieved. That is true, but it's beside MY point. > > In other words, at Baccarat, you're sort of like a spectator. You put your > money down, make no decisions whatsoever, and if you're incredibly lucky you > might be a long term winner. And despite of the fact that betting "Banker" > is one of the best casino bets available, it still favors the house, and in > the long term the vast majority of people lose. Yes, it favors the house, but by less than many, many bets available in casinos. > You can go into a bookstore and get a copy of my book, "Gambling For > Dummies," and see for yourself, or just take my word for the fact that a > player exerts no control over the results at the Baccarat table, I am not a "Dummy," so I am unlikely to buy your book. I do not dispute your allegation that the players exert no control over the results. I have never played Baccarat nor chemin-de-fer, but just vaguely recall that Ian Fleming described a game in which the players did decide whether to hit or not. Cheers, Alan Shank
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |