Re: Why is Neal Stevens a cruel person? (Was: Re: OT - But at least it's about people)

Johnny Judas Jay "the jackass jyotishit" Maharaj wrote:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (nmstevens) posted: 
>
> > . . . I am not bothered, in principle, by the 
> > idea of killing for food . . .
>
>
> Meat-eating is harmful for human health. Surely, you
> are "bothered" by ingesting harmful substances as "food"?

Why is it that you project yourself as being disturbed by people killing 
animals, and yet you have not the slightest qualm in encouraging, 
condoning, excusing and instigating the killing of human beings, 
specifically Muslims, Christians and secular Hindus? You come off as the 
worst two-bit lying hypocrite rat bastard that ever claimed to be a human.

As for meat-eating, it is *not* harmful to human health. Meat-eating is 
part of the food resource group available to human beings. You might as 
well say that eating vegetables is harmful to human health because of 
incidents like the recent green onion(leek) contamination incident. Meat 
eating, in moderation, is not only not harmful, but provides many benefits.

The truth about eating beef:
http://www.westonaprice.org/myths_truths/myths_truths_beef.html