Re: Why is Neal Stevens a cruel person? (Was: Re: OT - But at least it's about people)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars J. Aas) posted: 
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (nmstevens) posted: 
> >  
> > > Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote in message
> > >  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
> > > >  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (nmstevens) posted: 
> > > > > . . . I am not bothered, in principle, by the 
> > > > > idea of killing for food . . .
> > 
> > > > Meat-eating is harmful for human health. Surely, you
> > > > are "bothered" by ingesting harmful substances as "food"?
> > > > 
> > > > Visit the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
> > > > web site for excellent food recommendations:
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.pcrm.org
> > > > 
> > > > Jai Maharaj
> > 
> > > If eating meat were not harmful to human health . . .
> > 

> > diet *is* harmful to humans.
 
> Not in a million years!
> What I mean is, it's a matter of evolution.  In a million years,
> the animal-based diet will no longer be harmful. . . .

"Is" does not refer to a million years hence.

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti