Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Fruit Stickers-Look for the 8



<> wrote:

"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


The paranoid irrational food crazies get it wrong, AGAIN.


Would it be possible to reveal your source that would disprove this Metzgar
persons credibility?

I didn't say anything that challenged her credibility. It's the skanky whore Lesley's credibility that is always challenged.


I am not "paranoid", "irrational", or "leftist" but do
like to see both sides data before I make my own judgements If you do
respond, would it be possible to do it civily without profanity? Thanks...

I'm not sure what it is that you want to see documented. That the produce stickers don't contain barcodes? Here is a page:


http://www.mundanebehavior.org/outburst/shiman-07012002.htm

where you can see some standard produce ID stickers. The first two don't look like any stickers I've ever seen, but all the remaining ones are very typical of produce sold in the three largest grocery chains in Los Angeles (Ralphs, Vons and Albertsons). Note: no barcodes.

This page:

http://www.naturalfoodsmerchandiser.com/nfm_backs/sep_03/barcode.cfm

shows barcodes that may be coming soon, but are not yet in use. Read the article, and you'll see that grocers are very concerned with underpricing of organic produce, because of misidentification.

Currently, there are two possible errors: misidentifying organic produce as conventional, which grocers have an incentive not to do (immediate monetary loss); and misidentifying conventional produce as organic, which is against the law. The thrust of the article that the stupid lying whore Lesley posted is that grocers somehow want to fool consumers into thinking that conventional produce is organic, or at least allow them to think it. The charge is baseless, and all too predictably, the lying whore Lesley didn't offer anything to support the innuendo. Organic produce in supermarkets is clearly marked as organic, for the aforementioned incentive (get more money for it). There isn't a shopper anywhere who doesn't know that if it doesn't say organic, it isn't organic.






pearl wrote:


12-Nov-2003

You've noticed that tiny stickers that now appear on almost all
fruit, and probably been annoyed that you have to peel each one off.
These contain bar codes for the check-out clerk, but they also
contain a secret the store might not want you to know.

HERE we go: the usual paranoid irrational leftist belief that "they" - always some mysterious, invisible "they" for the fucking loony paranoids - want to conceal something.

The stickers do NOT contain bar codes.  They contain an
eye-readable numeric code that the grocery clerk must
manually into the terminal.

As for the "organic" bullshit, organic fruits and
vegetables always are identified as such.


Nutritionist Karma Metzgar of the University of Missouri writes that
these stickers also tell you if the fruit is organic or genetically-
modified. On conventionally-grown, non-organic fruit, the sticker has
only 4 numbers. Organically grown fruit has a five-numeral code,
which begins with the number 9. Since organic fruits and vegetables
now have to be in separate areas in grocery stores, this confirms
that your apple hasn't ended up in the wrong pile. However, the store
does not have to reveal which fruits and vegetables are genetically-
modified-but you can find out by looking at their stickers, which
will begin with the number 8.

According to Metzgar, this means a regular banana would have a
sticker saying 4011, an organic banana would say 94011 and a GM
banana would say 84011.

Lots of people complain that the stickers are too hard to peel off,
so it may be a relief to know that the adhesive is safe to eat.

http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=3314









<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.