
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
> >I'd also like to disagree with those who claim that the countercultural food >movement died after the 1970s. Organic/sustainable agriculture, opposition >to bioengineered foods, the slow-foods movement, etc. are all in the same >anti-modernist ideological tradition as both the pre-and-post-1960s health >foods movement. > Michael: I look forward to reading your article. Your above statements, however, appear to me to disagree with Warren Belasco's views presented in "Appetite for Change." Warren points out that the core of the countercultural movement was the hippies, who stressed communial experiences. J. I. Rodale et al in organic gardening promoted the Jeffersonian ideal of the yeoman farmer, which is very different. Lumping very diverse groups who espouse very different ideals --communes, small organic farmers, anti-gmo and anti-globalization types -- simply because you define them as "anti-modernist" doesn't seem to me to be particularly helpful or insightful. Or am I misunderstanding your point? Andy Smith
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |