
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In rec.backcountry Eugene Miya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>In rec.climbing John Reece <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> mark miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >>>> I'm attending the National Avalanche School later this month in Reno, >>>> and - hoping to keep costs down - would like to camp. >> >>> This begs the question, how are you/they going to do avalanche >>> training when no snow is likely? >> >>Because that's when it's offered. As Eugene says, there are multiple >>sections, and this one is all classroom. Whether it's really the >>right thing to do... I'll know either in a few weeks, or perhaps later >>this winter when I'm dead as a result of some misinformation or >>misapplied theory... >> >> -Mark, in Berkeley, where avalanche potential has thus far this year >>been fairly low... > Well actually, that's likely a sci.geo.geology topic. > It's the difference of what constitutes a land slide vs. > what constitutes an avalanche. touche. > You are just sitting next to the Hayward > Fault which goes thru the upper campus. > Locate a photo of the Blackhawk slide north of Big Bear Lake in So. Cal, > there a couple of square miles of land broke and slid miles on a cushion > of air at a couple hundred miles per hour. I think an aerial photo > appears in Norris and Webb's Geo. of California. > This is not to say that Reno is much safer.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |