
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Dave Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gould 0738 wrote: > > > > >Look, I don't pretend to know ALL of the answers, but it's been a given > > >that communities benefit when large businesses locate there. Talk to one > > >of your local congressmen or board of supervisors and let them explain > > >exactly why. > > > > > >Dave > > > > So, how is the free market served when small businesses in a locale are made to > > pay (through taxes) to subsidize a huge competitor? > > > > I keep hearing the rattlefrom the right that it's all OK because it's "free > > market", but nobody will answer my question about how it can be free market > > when one business is taxed in order to grant tax relief or public cash > > incentives to another. > > > If you want to get down to it, it's not "free market", as it's the > government interfering in it. But the government routinely interfers in > the free market if they feel that there's a good reason for it. The > problem is that one man's "good idea" is another man's worst > nightmare.... > > Dave So, if you decide to open a bed & breakfast after you retire, you don't think it would be unfair if the local government gave a Holiday Inn a tax incentive, while you had to buy the land and build everything using your retirement money?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |