Re: Fuel transfer/polishing pump

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:21:58 -0500, "Doug Dotson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing
>systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra
>expense would be hard to justify.

I guess I don't understand your system.  Why would it require two
independent polishing systems?  Even with a single set of filters (GCF
fillowed by Racor) you can use valves and piping to plumb the thing any
way you want.

Steve

>"Steven Shelikoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still
>> >runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will
>> >do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering
>> >system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between
>> >tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken
>> >up is the best thing I can hope for.
>>
>> Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line?  Allow for a
>> bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other
>> then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel.
>>
>> Steve
>
>