
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Fama volat." - Vergil On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:09:57 -0500, Alex Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Now when I walk into a LBS, all I see is compact geometry. Now according >>to the salespeople, compact is vastly superior to standard geometry. The >>smaller triangle makes it stiffer, etc. Last year they usually told me the >>standard was better. Does anyone know the truth? > >Yes it is stiffer, but did it need to be stiffer than it was before? Probably >not. It is not clear to me that the compact frame will necessarily be stiffer. With a compact style, only the seatmast and seatstays are shorter, and their contribution to frame stiffness is generally regarded as verging on negligibility. From where does the extra stiffness you claim come? ------------------------------- John Dacey Business Cycles, Miami, Florida Now in our twenty-first year. Our catalog of track equipment: eighth year online. http://www.businesscycles.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |