
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
jim beam wrote: > Tim McNamara wrote: >> Atribute the text you're replying to the author. Your newsreader >> should do this automatically (e.g., the attribution line above, which >> is "jim beam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:"). You've made several attacking >> posts which do not include the attributions- oddly enough, all of them >> being text from posts by Jobst. Your last post, from which I took the >> above text, had a correct attribution to me. If you're going to >> attack someone, at least be honest and up front about who it is. > > etiquette? that's easily fixed and is different from cowardice. > would have thought use of a threaded news reader made it obsolete. Not at all; it's inconvenient to have to re-retrieve parent articles just to see to whom one is replying, even if you ignore the problem of parents expiring. It's a bit like posts that ask a question in the Subject: line, and don't repeat it in the message body. -- Benjamin Lewis Mausoleum: The final and funniest folly of the rich. -- Ambrose Bierce
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |