
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Donald Gillies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Evan Evans) writes: > > What's wrong with Shimano? > 1. They killed Suntour. > 2. They only make throwaway items. > 3. They hadn't won a tour de france in decades until Lance/TREK. Several of these are wrong (IMO), but this is the wrongest. No component manufacturer has ever won a Tour de France, nor will ever win a Tour de France. Bicycle races are won by humans and components make damn little difference, which is one of the attractive features of the sport. I can think of other sports/games which have become an engineering competition as much as anything else. That's fine (engineers are competitive humans too) but it is nice to have a sport and pastime where buying the latest high-dollar X gives you no discernible advantage, other than to conspicuously consume. > 4. Their approach to components is like Borg to humans. This is an ironic complaint, given the above. > 5. They do not care about bicycle aesthetics (not since sante') > 6. People who buy Shimano pay more over the long term to run their > bikes because entire components / subsystems must be replaced to > effect simple repairs. > 7. Mr. Shimano was never a bicycist, so far as anyone knows. Just a > so-so industrialist.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |