Re: Risk Homeostasis - Drivers and Cyclists

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:32:18 GMT, "Mark Leuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from
Comcast Online wrote:

>
>"Kevan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 05:30:13 GMT, "Mark Leuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from
>> Comcast Online wrote:
>>
>> >"Kevan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 01:00:00 GMT, "Mark Leuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>from
>> >> Comcast Online wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >The minimum wage was never created for people to live on, it was
>created
>> >to
>> >> >simply be a minimum wage ...
>> >>
>> >> And companies would make every job minimum wage or less to increase
>profit
>> >if
>> >> they could get away with it. That's why unions are so important. One
>> >person
>> >> can't fight a company over wages, but lots of people together can.
>> >
>> >I never cared for unions, the biggest problem is was I could work (and
>did)
>> >as hard as I wanted to yet the person next to me did little, called in
>sick
>> >much of the time and STILL made as much as I did.
>>
>> Yeah? Where and when did that happen? I think you're telling a fib.
>
>UPS, Mesquite Texas, 1988 to 1989, think what you want

Wasn't UPS a shit company back then because it was _managed_ so poorly?

Being in a union isn't an exemption from being managed. It's protection from
being unfairly managed.




--
real e-mail addy: kevansmith23 at yahoo dot com
a quickly singing knife cash an ice play