
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Benjamin Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :> i don't really think it's a big deal to move your hand back to shift :> either, but the fact that you do isn't a selling point of bar-end :> shifters : : true . . . : :> it's a detriment. : : Not in my experience. it is a detriment. to you it may not be much of one. we're quibbling over matters of degree. i don't even think it's much of one but it is one. :> that's why so. whatever else you say about brifters your hands are :> already there. and that's a plus. : : Why is that a plus (for a non-racer?) I don't experience *any* : inconvenience. i'm not a racer .. but i do tour "fast" & i do appreciate being able to shift while climbing or otherwise out of the saddle. people tour in vastly different ways, in probably more ways than they commute. to me it's not a 15mph affair. : I can't see any benefit that not having to move my hands : would give me. you don't. i do. i find brifters much more convenient than bar-end shifters (shifteurs ryan?). : If you experience some inconvenience then it's a : disadvantage for you, but I don't see any objective disadvantages. well, i believe they are objective differences. just not to a degree to make the trade off for whatever it is you like about bar-ends shifters worthwile. eg, having your hands on the brakes while shifting is an objective advantage. how much that really increases safety is arguable (and i will not be going there in this thread). -- david reuteler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |