Re: Tom Beno contact information

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Frank Looper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > You've picked a real
> > gentleman sweetheart
> > whose "privacy" you want to protect.
> >
>    You missed the point, bright boy. It's a "principle". I disagree with a
> large percentage of Tom's posts, but to paraphrase what has been said, "I'd
> fight to the death for his right to post them".

Do you see something that challenges or threatens his "right to 
post them"? I don't. No complaint to his ISP, no demand to quit 
posting, nothing. So fight to the death for others right to 
post. Difficult concept for you? Are you a censor? A nazi?

>    You're a coward of the slimiest kind.

For repeating phone book info on the net? You are an alarmist 
dunce of the stupidest kind. Use the contact info as intended, 
to call in your support for his learned discourse, or to ignore 
at your choice.

>You make it really tough for me to
> stick to my own principles.

They must not be very strong to blow away so easily in this 
little breeze. Good luck.