
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Jon Meyer wrote: > You could describe it as 'interfering with the formation > of the tip vortex and thereby reducing drag', but an > easier to understand explanation (and just as accurate) > is that of the Thrust component of the force vector > produced by the winglet. The crossflow component generated > by the tip vortex means that the angle of incidence > of the winglet relative to the flow is different to > that relative to the line of flight. If this angle > is large enough then the winglet itself will no longer > produce a force component opposing the direction of > travel, but will instead produce a small 'Thrust' component > in the direction of travel. The fact that the winglet > is in fact producing a force in the direction of travel > is why the term 'Thrust' is perfectly correct. > Its easier to explain using a diagram, and plenty of > textbooks have them if you really are that interested. > The important thing to remember is that because of > the influence of the tip vortex, the flow striking > the winglet is not travelling in the same direction > as the freestream velocity. Thats what makes it all > possible. Ok, so my diagram of the winglet isn?t ok, because the airflow has an inbound direction. And so it?s possible that it?s lift can be divided into a inbound component an a thrust-component. I think now I got it. See also: http://www.ich-habs-doch-gleich-gesagt.de/winglet2.gif Greetings Bernhard
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |