
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Peter Duniho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "BTIZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > could not carry pax in an experimental? happens all the time... > > many home builts and gliders are certified experimental.. > > Not all experimentals carry the "amateur" or "kit-built" designation. True > > > the aircraft must be marked "experimental" in letters of a stated size and > > in an area visible to the pax > > True, for experimentals that are permitted to carry passengers. So? > just a side bar note > > must have been an insurance thing.. > > No, it was more likely an FAA thing. As in, with the installed avionics, > the plane was probably being operated under an R&D or "showing compliance" > designation, neither of which allow the carriage of passengers. > > Pete > > could be...
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |