Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: calendar TBO



Dan Luke wrote:
One finds many 20+ year old aircraft advertised with engine time =
airframe time, both in the neighborhood of 1000-1600 hours. Now, it is
my undersatanding that aircraft engines have a calendar TBO as well as a
tach TBO. however, prices for these aircraft do not seem to reflect
engines that are beyond TBO. Is calendar TBO something that is generally
ignored?

Yes, and certainly a seller in that position is going to do his best to ignore it.


Should a prospective buyer make a hard negotiating point about it?

As a buyer, I would certainly include it in my personal calculation of what I would pay. You're missing out on 20 years of engineering changes, for one thing. For another, it's probably had a lot of idle time for camshaft corrosion to get a grip.


OTOH, assuming the price is adjusted appropriately, I'd prefer to buy a plane with a runout engine and have it overhauled on my terms.

Dave
Remove SHIRT to reply directly.




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.