Re: The insane spitfire video clip

actually there are law suits against acacia by a couple of different companies. Not
directly against the DMT patents, but as a result of them and ongoings around them.

There is a group (whom I know personally and recently talked to on the phone) who has
been in litigation with acacia for awhile.
This isnt a new thing, its just recently they have been really pushing their license
thing. I think they will win, there is ALOT of people helping them find prior art. We
were first "asked" to sign their license agreement 3 months ago. The company in
litigation was  first "ask" to sign it last year.

Do What? wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:05:51 -0600, Do What? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:58:03 -0800, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Thats what their patent claims, so far, some of the biggest companies, Hustler,
> >>wicked, Vivid, lodge net, and others, have signed their license agreement. After
> >>our attorney reviewed the patents, we signed it also.
> >
> >How long ago was this?   Your attorney could have easily requested a
> >stay on the court date until the current lawsuit against Acacia is
> >settled (which will more than likley invalidate their patents).
>
> Just to correct myself...  there is no lawsuit against Acacia, but
> there are finally a group of defendants (11) that are well prepared to
> challenge the Acacia claim (something that has yet to be done).
>
> Either way, one could make a very strong case for a stay until those
> play out in the courts.