
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 16:27:31 GMT, Chad Irby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Adrian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> "Scott Ferrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> > In my opinion selling them top of the line stuff is the height of >> > stupidity. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what the >> > situation is going to be with China and the West in ten to fifteen >> > years. >> >> Please explain. I see no conflict coming. > >China has a lot of "issues" of the type that usually leads to war in one >way or another. > >They're on the edge of running out of oil, and don't have a strong >enough economy in most other respects to let them buy enough for their >near-future needs. There are, however, areas in their vicinity (Siberia >and Malaysia for example) that have oil. And Russia is a declining power; many have speculated on an eventual Chinese takeover of Siberia. >The Chinese government, despite the perceptions of some, is fairly >nasty, Indeed, they have a far-from-perfect human rights record. >and the Taiwan situation alone could make things go very bad, >very fast. That's true. >It wouldn't take much for a single event to push China over the edge. A >major earthquake at the Three Gorges Dam after it's filled up, for >example. In one stroke, they would lose much of their future electrical >generation *and* a lot of their crops and industrial production for a >year or two. I imagine the Chinese have thought about this. -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (Email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, but first subtract 275 and reverse the last two letters).
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |