
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Vince Brannigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tarver Engineering wrote:
It's beginning to sound like some junior officer decided on a Viet Nam type body count.
It was Reuters that decided to publish a body count.
no it is being widely reported as a major shift in US spin on the war.
The "widely reported" news source is lying; there is no change in the policy of not reporting a body count. Toumbstones are a poor metric for success, in winning hearts and minds.
"Numerous newspapers on Monday played up as front page news the Sunday clash between rebel forces and U.S. soldiers in the city of Samarra, with most declaring that between 46 and 54 Iraqis had been killed and using only U.S. military officials as their sources. After a run of bad news for the U.S. in Iraq -- including a record monthly death toll of U.S. soldiers -- the military portrayed this as a major victory, and the press seemed to accept it.
Except that the body count came out of Reuters, not US Military sources.
you are wrong New york times Dec 3
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |