
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...
- __From__: Charles Gray
- __Subject__: Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 06:56:49 -0600
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:44:24 -0600, "Gene Storey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>It was the body bean count that commanders don't want to get
>dragged into. 54 or 0, who gives a shit.
54 indicates a successful counter attack and a very bloody nose to the
insurgent forces.
0 indicates a near victory for said insurgent forces, as they managed
to attacka superior force, continue a fire fight for some time, and
than break contact all without losing any one.
The difference is obvious and quite important.
In truth, I'd bet it's somewhere between the two estimates.
- Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually..., (continued)
- Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...,
Tarver Engineering
- Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...,
Vince Brannigan
- Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...,
Tarver Engineering
- Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...,
Vince Brannigan
- Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...,
Chad Irby
- Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...,
Vince Brannigan
- Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...,
Charles Gray
- Re: Is that they call discriminate fire? Yes, actually...,
Michael Petukhov