
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Tarver Engineering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >"noname" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> As of last week, Lockheed Martin and EADS, >majority owner of Airbus, >> were assembling a tanker proposal that would >give Lockheed a 50% offset, >> according to the Air Force official. "[Airbus] >clearly will jump on this >> as an opportunity to compete not only on subsequent >buys, but also to >> take another whack at the first 100 since >Boeing and the Air Force are >> arguing over whether there's supposed to be >one contract or two. >> [Airbus] will come back with a sweetened deal." >> >> >http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/12013wna.xml > >Completing those tankers at Palmdale would draw >quite a bit of political >support; Boxer needs to save her job. > > Yes, but still, the Not Invented Here syndrome kicks in: The AF (and the rest of DOD) would prefer to buy a product marked "Made in USA" unless there is no other choice. (B-57 Canberra and AV-8 Harrier are obvious examples)Even a proposed Tornado Wild Weasel that would've been built at Rockwell International's Palmdale plant would have run into this problem. Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |