
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Dave J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]voices
Robert J. Kolker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Yang Li wrote: > > > > > Do you launch anther strike at Soviet cities and population at this > > time? Is it morally acceptable to kill innocent civilians and destroy > > their society because your own has been condemned? Justify. > > Because Revenge is Sweet. Didn't you know that. Don't get mad. Get even. > The Main Thing is never to be the sucker or boob that is left holding > the bag. Better everyone should die, than that. >
or you can say it in one of those well-modulated professional soldierlike in the Clancy movies "we need to eliminate their centers ofproduction,and their ability to continue to make war". We already proved we'd do itatDresden and Tokyo.
Dresden had nothing to do with war production and given that the war ended a few weeks later it's destruction had little effect on "ability to continue". It was either an experiment or a warning to the red army, that's all. Unnecessary killings of civilians are war crimes, that raid was just the most obvious.
Hugh Lunghi Fleet, Hampshire
-- M.J.Powell
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |