
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Stuart Wilkes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Stuart Wilkes' mom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > I always said Stuey would never amount to anything. > > Add another one to the list of Mark's spiteful lies. Really, Mark, > you should know by now that there's no real satisfaction in that. > > Stuart Wilkes > I'm just proving my point...that you can't talk about anything unless it's about WWII. You are the world's most boring person. > > "Drazen Kramaric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On 23 Oct 2003 03:20:56 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart Wilkes) > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> What were the numbers of soldiers involved in the two campaigns that > > > >> you are comparing. i.e: > > > > > > > >Suprisingly equal, Rostyk. I'm suprised you didn't know that. > > > > > > Post the numbers, then. > > > > > > > >> Size of armies in the west and the casualties? > > > > > > > >Well, the French Army alone suffered 1.9 million KIA and prisoners in > > > >the campaign in the West, while the combined > > > >Franco-Anglo-Belgian-Dutch armies inflicted ~27,000 KIA on the > > > >Germans. > > > > > > Your numbers are correct, but do not tell the whole story. France > > > surrendered because it had no more manpower nor space to continue the > > > war so all their remaining soldiers went to POW camps. Had you > > > included only POWs captured prior to cease fire the numbers would be > > > more correct, but would represent argument against your thesis, that > > > Red Army represented the most efficient enemy realistically possible. > > > > > > > > > >In this case, the Germans faced unprepared unalerted, peacetime-strength > > > >Rifle Divisions (~6000 men) far from their assigned battle positions, > > which is one of the > > > >advantages you get when you do a sneak attack. > > > > > > You are representing this as 3,000,000 German soldiers appeared out of > > > nowehere next to the Soviet border. The primary person responsible for > > > Red Army been caught napping is the man you feel was justified in > > > invading Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Finland under the > > > pretext of "security in case of German attack". > > > > > > Why don't you address that fact for a change? > > > > > > > > > Drax
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |