
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
E. Barry Bruyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 02:42:58 +0100, "John Mullen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >"Mikhail Medved" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >(snip) > > > >> > OTOH they alsoguaranteed a fight with the UK, then still (just!) the > world's > >> > leading military power. > >> > >> Any proof to that opinion? The "leading military power" was removed > >> from the continent in a few weeks of actual fighting. The biggest > >> battle was the battle of Alamein, in which they fiught a small German > >> corps. > > > >That battle was actually on the continent of Africa. The real biggest land > >battle didn't come until 1944 when we teamed up with the US to invade > >German-occupied France. Meantime we were fighting in the air, at sea, and in > >the minor theatres like N Africa. Would have become important had we lost > >though, doubt it not. > > North Africa was hardly a minor theatre, in that given a German win, > the loss of mid-east oil & Suez would have been critical to the war > effort. Agreed. That was why I said 'Would have become important had we lost though, doubt it not.' John
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |