
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
John, >For a pilot or an airplane? ;-) Touché! >Well, when I was flying the A-4C in 1977 or so, the one in the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum in DC was newer than the one I was flying! Since the designation "A-4C" was the pre-McNamara designation of A4D-2N, you WERE in all likelihood flying an "oldie." IIRC, the A4D-2N first hit the fleet in 1959 or 1960. Not that the Smithsonian's bird necessarily was any "newer" - we would hope yours still had usable wing life. <g> (Going rhetorical now) Which brings us - again - to the question, what is "old?" BuNo seniority? Airframe hours expended? Declining utility / suitability for a particular purpose? Increasing lack of spare parts / increasing cost of remaining spares? Ad nauseum. -- Mike Kanze "I never hated a man enough to give his diamonds back." - Zsa Zsa Gabor "John R Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Mike Kanze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... > > > What is "old?" > > For a pilot or an airplane? ;-) > > > 1) You don't know what "old" is (or feels) until you see a bird whose BuNo > > adorns several of your logbook entries sitting in a museum somewhere. In my > > case: KA-6D, BuNo 152910, now sitting forlornly in the back lot of the > > Western Aerospace Museum at Oakland airport > > Well, when I was flying the A-4C in 1977 or so, the one in the Smithsonian Air & > Space Museum in DC was newer than the one I was flying! >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |