
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 26 Nov 2003 02:31:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (s.p.i.) wrote: >A G-V or EMB-145. I still question the wisdon of putting such high >value mission on airframes that are well designed to withstand failure >as opposed to damage. Eventually we will run up against an adversary Remember, *all* the aircraft performing these various missions (RC-12, RC-7, RC-135, EP-3) are based on (if not converted directly from) civilian designs. So far this has not been an issue, so it seems reasonable for the replacement to follow the same course. -- Andrew Toppan --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- "I speak only for myself" "Haze Gray & Underway" - Naval History, DANFS, World Navies Today, Photo Features, Military FAQs, and more - http://www.hazegray.org/
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |