
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
My insurance doesn't require anything except annual recurrent training at one of two places. Other than that requirement, there are no restrictions. Mike MU-2 "markjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The original poster said that he wanted to be able to get places on a > > schedule. What that requires depends on where you are and where you are > > going, but to me it requires radar, known ice, high altitude capability > and > > range. > > I think there are two issues here: suitability for single-pilot use and > capability to tackle weather. The two sorta work against one another - > probably the easiest to fly plane IFR is something like an 182, but you're > not going to be tackling much weather. Conversely, a plane like Mike's MU-2 > is very capable, but you've got to ante up to very high proficiency > standards. (Mike, are your insurers Ok with you flying alone in clouds? > I've heard they're starting to get very sticky about turbines twins being > flown single-pilot.) > > In reality, we don't choose planes that are good for single-pilot IFR - we > choose planes that suit our mission (and constraints, particularly costs) > and then ante up what it takes to fly them safely IFR. For me, a > non-professional IFR pilot who gets maybe 5 hours a year actual in my > non-iced heavy single, this means scrubbing a lot of flights. > > I think that is the big fallacy with new instrument pilots - that they can > truly fly in any weather and can meet hard schedule committments. It takes > a lot of airplane and a lot of training/experience to be able to > consistently tackle IFR weather with reasonable risk. I'd guess that on any > given mission, I can make it VFR 80% of the time. IFR cuts my scrubs in > half so I can go 890% of the time, but I still have a 10% scrub rate even > with the the ticket. Ice is the big issue for me. > > In reality, I use IFR more for flying security and convenience rather that > tackling weather. It's just a lot easier to file IFR and follow ATC's > instructions rather than keeping track of everything yourself, especially > with all the airspace restrictions these days. > > - Mark > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |