Re: FAR 91.157 Operating in icing conditions

"Steven P. McNicoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Teacherjh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Spam cans are now (this is a change) forbidden to enter FORECAST icing -
> > that is, "forecast" icing is now considered "known icing".  This is a
> change.
> >
>
> Cite the regulation.
>
It's actually not a change.   While everybody says "known icing" every regulation
that exists says "forecast or known" icing.

What there was a furor over was that a decision was issued that PIREPS indicating
absence of ice did not have priority over forecasts.