Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: FAR 91.157 Operating in icing conditions



Mike Rapoport wrote:

I don't think that Collins would disagree that forecast icing is known
icing.  He might choose to launch anyway but the legalities are clear.

Here's an interesting footnote to this whole discussion. Since I'm planning a trip in the U.S. next weekend, earlier this evening I was playing around learning the Java applets at


http://adds.aviationweather.gov/java/

They're very neat, but I noticed that the U.S. CIP showed (Monday evening) a high probability of icing all around southern and eastern Ontario and Northern New York from the surface to 10,000 ft: definitely a no-fly day.

Just out of interest, I then glanced at the Canadian GFA for turbulence and icing:

http://www.flightplanning.navcanada.ca/Latest/gfa/anglais/Latest-gfacn33_turbc_000-e.html

It had no icing forecast at all in this part of Canada Monday evening, aside from the boilerplate warning "GENLY LGT RIME ICGIC ABV FRLVL" which is automatically printed on every chart: obviously a perfect night for an IFR flight.

In the event, by late evening there were no icing PIREPS in the Montreal or Toronto FIRs.


All the best,



David





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.