Re: FAR 91.157 Operating in icing conditions

The court case upon which this definition is based is Adminstrator vs Bowen,
a 1957 case...hardly new info.

Bob Gardner

"Teacherjh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> There was a change in the last five? years.
>
> There are two things under discussion - the "large and turbine" reg, and
the
> "spam can" default reg.
>
> Spam cans are now (this is a change) forbidden to enter FORECAST icing -
that
> is, "forecast" icing is now considered "known icing".  This is a change.
>
> I don't fly large and turbine powered aircraft, so don't know if that reg
has
> changed.
>
> Jose
>
> --
> (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)